Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bonkers The Clown (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep. WP:SNOW. If anyone wants to add, they can do so. (non-admin closure) --Jakob (Scream about the things I've broken) 02:00, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

User:Bonkers The Clown


Userpage for an indefinitely blocked user. Such pages are conventionally replaced with. This, however, was summarily reverted by The Devil's Advocate. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 18:15, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Oppose, Bonkers will be back there is no reason to erase his page. I would've reverted too. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 18:25, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - Deleting because they're blocked isn't a valid reason & IMHO there's no reason for it to be deleted...... - →Davey 2010→ →Talk to me!→  18:39, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. I have put back. The Clown is still not funny. jni (talk) 18:41, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep history and information for readers who may want to find out about a contributor. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:52, 26 November 2013 (UTC)


 * ps for clarity: I vote for not only keep the page but also its contents. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:54, 26 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep page and contents Useless squabble here. the template can stay but everything else should be put back. This nomination and the events leading up to it were not necessarily in good faith.  Konveyor   Belt  19:41, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - I guess I have a soft spot for Bankers - he declined my first article. I don't see a problem with keeping a blocked user's page showing pride in his contributions, even if it is unconventional. I don't have an opinion about whether it is blanked or not - as long as it's not deleted. &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 20:05, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep along with content, long term contributor here. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:20, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep unless perhaps someone can explain to me what has substantially changed since the very recent snow keep of the previous nomination? --Demiurge1000 (talk) 21:01, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Bonkers wasn't blocked indefinitely the last time his userpage was at MFD. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 22:31, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Do you go through lists of users looking for that? What else do you do? --Demiurge1000 (talk) 01:56, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Nothing wrong with it. But I support adding the blocked user template to the top.  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 00:55, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Add the blocked user template. This doesn't need to drag through MfD for a simple solution. buffbills7701 01:48, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.