Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bowser423/EVI

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 15:04, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

User:Bowser423/EVI


Completely against consensus. Not supported by anything. Part of Bowser423's recent flurry of good-faith but unhelpful pages. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 14:25, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, part of a pretty disruptive span of edits when you consider his recent contributions, and this adds nothing of use to Wikipedia. Strange Passerby (talk • cont) 15:42, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, makes claims that are incompatible with the deletion policy. Tito xd (?!? - cool stuff) 19:02, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - this editor needs help. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 22:51, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - I don't see the point of keeping the page.  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 23:30, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - without a point - not in line with policy, and gaming the system as well (userfied to save from MfD).Jasper Deng (talk) 01:07, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
 * DeleteEssay describing a method to game the deletion system which would have little chance of success in the long run in keeping article inappropriate for Wikipedia in one's userspace when they are about to be deleted. Edison (talk) 20:41, 3 August 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.