Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:BraedonRPaul/Broom 3000




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. @harej 00:50, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

User:BraedonRPaul/Broom 3000
inappropriate use of userspace. The content was an article that was userfied in April 2009 to allow the user in question to turn it into something usable, and this hasn't been done - the only edits since then have been delinking bots. Ironholds (talk) 23:49, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Delete per nom Irbisgreif (talk) 07:34, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. This reads like a sales pitch. The article is unsalvageable, even if the subject were notable, and the owner hasn't shown any inclination to work on it anyway. --UsaSatsui (talk) 14:57, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: The whole reason that we userfy articles is so that they can be developed, then removed to article space. That's not what's happening here. GrooveDog (oh hai.) 16:37, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete They can just start over if they want to give it another go. Not much useful here. Gigs (talk) 00:03, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 * As an aside, this article is the top hit on Google for Broom 3000. Helpful to remember that userspace is indexed. Gigs (talk) 00:05, 8 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Would be CSD'd in a heartbeat in normal space.-- SKATER  Speak. 02:22, 9 September 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.