Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Brendanology/Supercentenarians

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. --BDD (talk) 17:26, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Brendanology/Supercentenarians


In line with Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Deaths in 2013/My OR stuff and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bensonfood, WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE concerns. Ricky81682 (talk) 17:53, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

*Delete - Tables 1 and 3 are just the top ten oldest living at a certain point in time which goes against WP:OR and WP:TRIVIA. Table 2 is also WP:OR. CommanderLinx (talk) 04:11, 23 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Ca2james (talk) 15:36, 24 December 2014 (UTC)


 * OR and "Trivia" are not sufficient reasons for deletion of other's userspace pages. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:48, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Ah, thanks for pointing that out. Striking original comment as per SmokeyJoe's reply. Delete - per WP:NOTWEBHOST. CommanderLinx (talk) 04:47, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
 * "NOTWEBHOST", as in of no reasonable intent to contribute to the project (implied that it is for some outside purpose). Yes, that's a good reason to delete.  I am mystified as to why people would be doing this.  I also guess that it is copied from somewhere.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:23, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.