Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Brittany Hudson/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:11, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

User:Brittany Hudson/sandbox

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Violation of no original research and what Wikipedia is not. Per WP:USERFY, material already not permitted in user namespace is not allowed to be userfied. See also: Articles for deletion/Gender Analysis of "Minty Minty", Articles for deletion/Gender Theory In 'President Daisy', and Articles for deletion/Love Silk food. LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 20:06, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Pure WP:OR, and depressing since an instructor has set an injudicious project, top the disadvantage of the students. Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents is discussing the project 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:56, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep — I’m confused by the deletion rationale, since isn’t a user sandbox exactly the place where editors are supposed to develop content that is currently unsuitable for main space? This appears to me to be a good-faith attempt to write article content (whatever the ultimate fate of that content may be) and it is very possible that this preliminary writing could lead the author to useful wiki edits. It is my understanding that a sandbox should only be deleted for much more serious problems like copyvio, BLP offences, or cases where someone is trying to use Wikipedia as free web hosting for unrelated content. Deleting a sandbox in this case feels like biting the newbies. ~ L 🌸  (talk) 23:52, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep as per L's rationale; this isn't a mainspace article, this is a user sandbox wizzito  &#124;  say hello!  03:20, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep and trout nom. I don't see a userfication in the history, so I'm not sure what that sentence of the nomination is about. WP:NOR does not apply to drafts (and not all of this is OR regardless). WP:NOTESSAY might be a basis to delete a userspace page that makes no attempt at encyclopedic content, but this is a draft article! If we deleted every draft that needs serious work to not violate WP:NOT, we'd delete most drafts. If you'd like to explain to the author the ways that Wikipedia articles differ from academic essays, they have a talkpage. --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 20:52, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per above. —Locke Cole • t • c 19:43, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per L/Tamzin. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 14:27, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.