Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Broter/Ban on Muslim immigration

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:42, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

User:Broter/Ban on Muslim immigration


This userbox violates WP:UBX which states "Wikipedia is not an appropriate place for propaganda, advocacy, or recruitment of any kind, commercial, political, religious, or otherwise, opinion pieces on current affairs or politics, self-promotion, or advertising." It also violates WP:NOTSOAPBOX and is particularly troubling given our mission of building a global, inclusive online encyclopedia. The editor who created this userbox has also created some other questionable userboxes listed at the bottom of this page. - MrX 20:49, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  d.g. L3X1  (distænt write)   )evidence(  00:48, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep: Anti-Trump Userboxes are also allowed, look at Userboxes/Politics.--Broter (talk) 07:23, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * That's an WP:OTHERSTUFF argument. Do you have an argument based on policy?- MrX 11:45, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, What_Wikipedia_is_not.--Broter (talk) 14:28, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * That policy applies to articles, and it merely states that avoiding cultural offence is a goal subservient to completeness of coverage. WP:NOTCENSORED is not a blanket licence to put literally anything into Wikipedia. —Keφr 21:54, 25 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per nominator. And because the vast majority of userboxes are a waste of resources, of which this is just one example. —Keφr 21:54, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Other editors should be on notice as to who they're dealing with.  E Eng  12:55, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Other editors should watch out if the contents of a user's contributions are tendentious, instead of using the presence of a userbox as an excuse for holding a grudge, harassing them in unrelated areas or making ad hominem arguments. —Keφr 15:02, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Huh?  E Eng  20:38, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.