Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Broter/Deplorable Donald Trump supporter

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 05:13, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

User:Broter/Deplorable Donald Trump supporter

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

I can tolerate simply stating you do or do not support a politician, even one like Trump, but this just feels like “U mad bro”/“owning the libs” trolling from a notoriously disruptive and bigoted user. Dronebogus (talk) 10:49, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. It is disruptive. Its creator is banned. Only one other person is using it. Legitimate alternatives are available. --DanielRigal (talk) 11:02, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Another user using it is a strong reason to keep. Legitimate alternatives (you assert this is illegitimate?, I’ll guess you mean “better”) is a reason to redirect. SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:21, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete troll box by banned troll ClaudineChionh (talk – contribs) 11:14, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - Trolling, and user has been banned. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:17, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: Contributors here may also be interested in Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User Kafir Lives Matter which covers a few other boxes made by the same user. --DanielRigal (talk) 19:09, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:54, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: A reasonable position. Not trolling. Not divisive (describes the user, doesn’t assert a political statement).  It is not normal to expunge records of banned contributors who were once ok.   SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:48, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * But was Broter ever really okay? He made some decent contributions but his whole record is blotted by his virulent islamophobia, which was so extreme he was double-banned (one from Wikipedia and another separately from islam). Dronebogus (talk) 08:50, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
 * He made good contributions. I’m sure he intended to contribute positively.  He had issues, and it went downhill, increasingly.  He didn't engage in enough talk or user_talk. Gravedancing is applicable. Regarding his usersubpages, and userboxes, of no positive value, if you are sure, blank them. Just plain blank, or use Userpage blanked. Do it quietly.  Only escalate to MfD if someone reverts you. SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:18, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - eh. As tempted as I am to say nuke all of this user's creations for egregious POV-pushing, there's not really a precedent for that. I don't see this as nearly as problematic as some of the others, and I see it's in use by one other person, so meh. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 22:43, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Appears to serve no purpose in advancing the encyclopedia, regardless of its content. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 05:05, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.