Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bsdman




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Deleted - Peripitus (Talk) 07:44, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

User:Bsdman
Userpage is only an advertisement for the User's band --Funandtrvl (talk) 02:47, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTMYSPACE. M0RD00R (talk) 19:32, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as promotion. Ordinarily, blank such pages on discovery.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:42, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Not consistent with WP:UP; not helpful to Wikipedia. Johnuniq (talk) 06:29, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as a db-band "article" in userspace. I'd say the username needs a spamusername block, as well. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  15:55, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for pointing out the db-band template, would the user page qualify for it? --Funandtrvl (talk) 16:34, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * No. Orangemike was saying that if it were in mainspace it would quality for speedy deletion under db-band. The "A" series of speedy deletion templates (for example, this one being A7) are for mainspace articles only. However, promotional articles can sometimes be put under  Gigs (talk) 21:11, 23 December 2009 (UTC) 21:12, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks again for pointing out the differences and the csd-g11 template. I can see where that template may apply, but the user namespace seems to be a different animal. Too bad someone has not yet come up with a clear-cut and well-defined speedy delete template strictly for the user namespace. Or have they?? --Funandtrvl (talk) 21:23, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The G-series templates can be used in any namespace. There are a few templates specific to userspace, see Csd.  You might want to read the rest of that page as well if you are interested in the speedy deletion criteria. They must be used with caution, as the administrator may only spend a few seconds reviewing your tagging, so it's important to get it right to avoid mistakes being made. Gigs (talk) 21:26, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.