Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Burghtown

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 17:53, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

User:Burghtown


This is a userpage with information about a non-notable band; no sources found other than social media sites. Should it be deleted per WP:FAKEARTICLE? Dianna (talk) 02:35, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as promotion by an SPA. There is not sign of sufficient notability for the band.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:14, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. -- Klein zach  13:31, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

This is no fake article, nor should it be considered for deletion. My band has notability which is more than suffice...Google us. Prototype - COO — Preceding unsigned comment added by Burghtown (talk • contribs) 03:44, 26 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per above and G11. I suggest a block for Burghtown, account is used solely for self-promotional purposes. hmssolent\Let's convene 00:32, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * That is too harsh. Instead, let's refer the author to Alternative outlets.  It is entirely reasonable to assume that some people know that Wikipedia is a top website that accepts anybody's contribution of content, but do not appreciate the limited scope of an encyclopedia.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:11, 29 January 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.