Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Burntout123/Neovandalism

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Delete WP:SNOW. Black Kite (talk) 20:31, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

User:Burntout123/Neovandalism


Rant masquerading as an article. Neil N  talk to me 14:57, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Just a disgruntled editor having a rant. There's nothing wrong with having a rant, of course, but not by trying to write an article about it. Squinge (talk) 15:06, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is not a draft of a viable article nor is it an appropriate userspace essay. I agree with the above: it's just another rant, one in a series of many by this user who has very few edits outside of such similar rants. -- Kinu  t/c 15:49, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. A rant disguised as an article draft, from an editor who overall (regrettably) seems more interested in doing the former than the latter. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 16:32, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete This will never be an article, and it's unlikely even to be an acceptable essay. BMK (talk) 18:44, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete As above, and note that the sources provided, as well as the suggestions for further reading, have nothing to do with the article's subject. --bonadea contributions talk 20:21, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing WP:GNG for the topic itself, rather being WP:SYNTH well beyond anything any of the refs directly support. DMacks (talk) 20:26, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.