Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Butlerwhite/ThatSexShop




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was speedily deleted by User:WikiLeon, non-admin close. – ukexpat (talk) 03:58, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

User:Butlerwhite/ThatSexShop
Promotional page of non-notable business (not suitable for article). Johnuniq (talk) 07:25, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Remove all commercial links should be sufficient. The worst that can be said about any such article in userspace is that the editor has a likely COI. COI, however, applies to articles in mainspace, as most userspace pages do relate in some way to the user. Username appears proper, so not deletable for that.  I would just treat it as sandbox, and remove the links. Collect (talk) 12:34, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * If it's article content, then article content policies and guidelines should be taken into account, regardless of namespace. They shouldn't strictly apply of course, as we give people latitude and time to bring articles into compliance with policies and guidelines in userspace, but it's not an irrelevant consideration. Gigs (talk) 21:30, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Userspace is not mainspace, and the exceptions for userspace include limited information about the person - which this would appear to qualify as (minus any commercial links) Collect (talk) 23:05, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: See http://www.butlerwhite.co.uk/html/about.html - clearly an attempt at promotion. – ukexpat (talk) 01:57, 22 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: It's been there since September, clearly an abandoned draft. User name also appears to be a violation of WP:ORGNAME. – ukexpat (talk) 20:39, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment The orgname would be "ThatSexShop" - but the username appears to be the person's real name - not an orgname. Collect (talk) 23:05, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: Er I think not.... – ukexpat (talk) 01:57, 22 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Oops -- that's what comes from me thinking it was a person's name. Still the primary course of action is to remove all the commercial links.  I doubt many Americans will think as other than I. Collect (talk) 02:09, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Provided that the external links are removed, per Collect above. Also, if the article is to remain in user subspace indefinitely, are the stub template and categories appropriate? --  At am a  頭 23:34, 21 December 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.