Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Caiyad

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Discussion closed due to page move. The page was moved during the MfD discussion from User:Caiyad in userspace to Caiyad Phahad in the mainspace. As such, the page can no longer be discussed effectively at MfD. This closure is not a judgment about the merits of the article, and any editor who wants to renominate the page at Articles for deletion is free to do so at any time. Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:57, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Caiyad Phahad


WP:EN is not Facebook. While we allow users considerable latitude in the construction of their user pages, this is promotional, not helpful for WP:EN. Also note that this user's only contributions to WP:EN have been on this page. . . Jim - Jameslwoodward (talk to me • contribs) 13:01, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Dear James, Please help me and guide me and advise me instead of taking action, i am new and i am working hard to create a page, but if you guys do this instead of helping me that will not be justice..please let me know what shall i remove and i will remove  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caiyad (talk • contribs) 13:29, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Please do not remove the mfd template as you did here. Cunard (talk) 07:26, 1 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. The purpose of Wikipedia is to produce a high quality encyclopedia; it is neither a social networking site nor a resume service and we are not here to boost your ego. You have made zero effort to improve the encyclopedia over the last 2.5 years; creating an irredeemably self-promotional WP:FAKEARTICLE/resume hybrid does not count. MER-C 03:28, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per, WP:NOTADVERTISING, and WP:NOTWEBHOST. Because this user has made no edits outside of promoting himself, and because the page violates WP:FAKEARTICLE, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 07:26, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment The user has struggled to figure out how to move this content into the main space, so I did so. It turns out the person writing it is the manager of the person and I have assured them they cannot edit this article themselves any further to avoid deletion. But, it'll probably be deleted. I'm indifferent. Just letting you know what has happened. :) SarahStierch (talk) 17:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.