Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Camerafiend/Temporary

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep. — xaosflux  Talk 02:33, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

User:Camerafiend/Temporary


User space draft of New Mexico that was last edited (actively) in 2011/2012. Per WP:REDUNDANTFORK, it's not helpful to keep this active. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:22, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment As noted, this is a draft article that I was developing several years ago. I'm unlikely to finish it at this point, but there is quite a bit of content particularly in the history section that might be worth merging. While I am quite busy in real life, I still intend to look into this eventually. I respectfully ask that this nomination be withdrawn. Camerafiend (talk) 03:41, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I'll agree to withdraw it. If you would like, we could merge the content into the article and then history merge the rest of it? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 00:35, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I don't want to burden anyone else trying to sort this out as the situation is rather convoluted and I'm not actually certain whether any of it is worth merging. In the mean time I'm going to blank the sections that I didn't work on, which should help lessen the confusion for anyone who stumbles across it. Camerafiend (talk) 15:16, 1 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep per Camerafiend's comments. It might be appropriate to no-index the page. Newyorkbrad (talk) 23:22, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The userdraft message already noindexes the page I believe. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 00:37, 1 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Consider replacing with Inactive userpage blanked during periods of not editing it. Note that generally, long term hosting of forked content for drafting purposes is considered a bad thing because it creates attribution hazards.  If someone else edits this userpage, are you going to ensure they receive attribution when you copy-paste back to mainspace?  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 14:39, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I understand the potential for attribution headaches here. If I do end up merging anything I will of course keep an eye on that. I'll try to resolve this as expediently as I can. Camerafiend (talk) 15:18, 1 October 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.