Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Cang1988/Userbox/Userbox Name

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:12, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

User:Cang1988/Userbox/Userbox Name

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Likely meant to be purely inflammatory, given that the creator also created (now-deleted) userboxes in support of the Uyghur genocide, racial segregation and Holocaust denial. Sumanuil.  (talk to me) 05:29, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:UP and WP:UBCR. Promoting political causes in userspace is counterproductive to the goals of Wikipedia. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 05:50, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Given that it was created by a now blocked user to be annoying. -- Rockstone Send me a message!  06:52, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Would say Redirect to an existing userbox that says the same thing, but there's no point, it's not used anywhere, so a redirect would be pointless. As I understand, political commentary in userspace is discouraged, but not prohibited, so this is a legitimate userbox. However, given that it was created alongside such delightful userboxes as ones supporting the Russian invasion of Ukraine and genocide denial, the user's intent is pretty damn clear, and this isn't just simply expressing a political opinion. It's trolling, at best. Could always just speedy it as G5, since they've doubtless been here before. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 12:31, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Are you shitting me? Keep. If we're headhunting these types of political opinions now, then we badly need that RfC. --🌈WaltCip - (talk)  15:32, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Changed to neutral, but only because it was created by a blocked troll. But this should not, and should never, set a precedent for the types of userboxes we will be deleting in the future. --🌈WaltCip - (talk)  15:33, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I think this is where the consensus lies anyways, I mean the userbox can always be remade in good faith. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 18:58, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Obviously meant to be inflammatory, very much in line with other "creations" of this blocked user/troll. —  Sundostund  mppria  (talk / contribs) 03:26, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:DENY, not because it’s sufficiently controversial in itself. Dronebogus (talk) 03:40, 20 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, noting recent creation by a blocked non-contributor. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:15, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:DENY, I would have absolutely no problem with someone else creating a "This user supported the presidency of Donald John Trump." userbox if done in good faith. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 18:55, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
 * That wording, however, is somewhat problematic. It seems to imply he's still in office. Sumanuil.  (talk to me) 05:48, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't think it reads that way, even if it's "supports" or "supported". If there were more explicit language saying something like "This user supported Donald John Trump being successfully elected for a second term in 2020", then that would definitely be inflammatory in the fashion of a conspiracy theory. 🌈WaltCip - (talk)  15:15, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Of note is that other, much worse userboxen by that troll got deleted, which made me surprised that this one was still up. Liliana UwU  (talk / contribs) 02:42, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, MAGA was a label used by the Capitol stormers as a pretext to overthrow democracy. Zorya's Leshak▲  (-10.0)     04:17, 22 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete Also support WaltCip's second comment. I don't care specifically where it came from, but if it does indeed contain a label which incites violence (per Zorya's Leshak), we should delete it. Like Knowledgekid87 said, this userbox can always be remade in good faith. — V ORTEX  3427 (Talk!) 07:12, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.