Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Carolineneil/sandbox/Concentrating Parameters out of the Objective Function

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: redirect to Draft:Concentrating Parameters Out of the Objective Function. The problem with this editor isn't that she keeps multiple copies of stuff or has multiple sandboxes. It's that she submits the multiple copies repeatedly and often at the same time. So there will be pending AfC submissions for the userspace version and the draftspace versions simultaneously, which obviously is confusing for the reviewers and wastes their time. Often times she resubmits things that have already been accepted into mainspace, for reasons that are totally opaque to anyone. Again, wastes reviewers' time figuring out we already have the article.

Unfortunately, has never responded to a single one of the numerous messages on her talk page asking for clarification of her intent or her process. So yeah, we don't know her process, because she won't tell us what on earth it is. At a certain point communication is required. Because the draft is not yet accepted as a mainspace article, I have redirected instead of deleting this one, but I have deleted all the rest. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:07, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

User:Carolineneil/sandbox/Concentrating Parameters out of the Objective Function


Also in draft space at Draft: Concentrating Parameters Out of the Objective Function. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:21, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * What's the actual rationale for delete? Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 22:54, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete' I'm guessing multiple resubmission based on all the pages created by the same editor Robert McClenon just nominated Legacypac (talk) 23:14, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * But this has never been submitted even once...? I'm probably gonna go keep but would also like to hear the rationale first. A2soup (talk) 23:47, 15 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect, don't delete. Userspace and draft space content fork should be fixed by WP:ATDs where possible.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:19, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I disagree with your characterization of this sandbox/AfC draft duplication as a "content fork". WP:CFORK makes it clear that "content fork" refers to cases involving an article - after all, Wikipedia's "content" is the mainspace. Even if that were not the case, surely this would be an acceptable fork as a temporary subpage. Since there is no improper content fork, nothing needs to be fixed. A2soup (talk) 15:36, 16 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Duplicate of Draft:Concentrating Parameters Out of the Objective Function. This editor keeps resubmitting duplicate copies, sometimes of things that are pending inquiries, sometimes of things that are already in article space.  Robert McClenon (talk) 01:25, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Question - Redirect to what? To the draft?  Redirecting to the draft is okay.  Robert McClenon (talk) 01:25, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to draft is fine. Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 01:30, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * No action/keep - It is ridiculous to curate people's userspaces in this way. is trying to create articles and made this sandbox draft shortly before creating a corresponding draftspace draft for AfC. Now, I don't know her workflow, but neither does anyone else here. Maybe she intends to use the sandbox to test edits for the AfC draft. Maybe she feels that draftspace is more scrutinized and prefers to do a pre-draft in her sandbox. Who knows? I am just wondering why in the sam hill we are snooping around her sandbox and deciding to delete/redirect/whatever pages there that she made barely a week ago and clearly never intended to submit to any sort of community consideration?? Let's let Carolineneil manage her own sandbox, hm? This is a huge waste of everyone's time, a BITE for Carolineneil, and cannot produce any conceivable benefit for the encyclopedia. A2soup (talk) 15:16, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.