Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Cass81/sandbox2

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. If other sandboxes merit deletion, nominate those separately. — ξ xplicit  00:06, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

User:Cass81/sandbox2
Copy of the The Worst Kept Secret article that was deleted on August 9, 2009 via CSD G11. This sandbox was first created June 20, 2009 and last worked on July 13, 2009. User last worked on the Andrew Davis (coach) (NOTE: Andrew Davis is the founder of the website that is the subject of this article) article on July 17, 2009. (NOTE: see also User:Cass81/sandbox - the sandbox version last worked on July 13, 2009) Also as the mainspace deletion of this article, and potential deletion of this sandbox, would orphan the associated images (File:Logotwks.png and File:Twkssnippet.JPG), even though they appear to have an OTRS, I am putting following questions out here: Soundvisions1 (talk) 20:36, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * 1. As the license's all state "I created this work entirely by myself", if the OTRS's are valid, it would also imply this article was justly deleted as "Unambiguous advertising or promotion" - so is there any chance this article could make it back into mainspace with someone else re-working it?
 * 2. If the answer to "1" is no, is there any reason to retain the orphaned images?
 * Delete both sandboxes WP:FAKEARTICLE says, "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion." Because these pages violates WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE, they should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 22:27, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * If you want the images deleted, I recommend that you nominate them for deletion at WP:FFD. Cunard (talk) 22:27, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * It is acceptable to include them in a deletion discussion such as this where the articles images will be orphaned, and most likely unusable, from the deletion of the article. It saves an undeeded, double process. Beyond that the question(s) raised here were not if this article violated anything but if this article could be reworked as a valid mainspace article, if not than the page can be deleted or the page can be simply be blanked, if so it can be userfied. Soundvisions1 (talk) 05:11, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * A Google News Archive search for the blog and one of its founders, Andrew Davis, returns no results, so I believe that the company is notable. You are correct that orphaned images are generally uncontroversial deletions so I support the deletion of File:Logotwks.png and File:Twkssnippet.JPG because they serve no purpose after the deletion of the userspace draft. Cunard (talk) 07:21, 4 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Per Cunard and nom.  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 01:23, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.