Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:CharlieWhiteheadActor

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Delete - unanimous. Wily D 09:01, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

User:CharlieWhiteheadActor


Per WP:UPNO, specifically WP:FAKEARTICLE - the user was asked in mid-August to stop using the user pages of his accounts as storage for his autobiographies. He removed one but kept, and has edited, two others. At present, this is not a person who would be eligible to have a Wikipedia article written about them. bonadea contributions talk 10:40, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Also nominating:


 * Delete - User pages are not a substitute for hosting article subjects that do not meet inclusion guidelines. -- Whpq (talk) 13:56, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Clear WP:FAKEARTICLE created after Charlie Whitehead (Actor) had been deleted at AFD twice (9 December 2011 and 4 November 2012). Editor has made more edits to his promotional pages:- User:CharlieWhiteheadActor, User:CharlieWhiteheadArticleList and User:CharlieTheTalkingOrange (Later moved to User:CharlieWhiteheadActor/sandbox) than useful edits to the benefit of Wikipedia. Arjayay (talk) 14:59, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

The editor placed the following comment on the talk page of the discussion, so I'm copying it here. --bonadea contributions talk 15:26, 21 October 2013 (UTC) Thank you for your notices, I was only asked to take down one of my pages, or I have misunderstood the situation, which I have done. As you have asked I will remove the article list and I will put another notice at the top of my user page stating it is not a wikipedia article although I wish for User:CharlieWhiteheadActor to remain up as I have put a lot of time into this and believe as it is my user page, that as long as readers know this is so it is okay to be left up. Many thanks for reading this and I hope you take my views and actions into consideration, if you wish to delete my pages please reply and allow me to acknowledge first. Best regards CharlieWhiteheadActor (talk) 13:31, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete all A user page must not be written in the style of a Wikipedia article, generally.  Even with the disclaimer, it still lends the credibility of Wikipedia to the content within, and is not primarily about the editor's Wikipedia activities, but rather, is still an article-style autobiography.  User space may contain some personal information, but primarily exists to describe and facilitate your editing activities here at Wikipedia, not as a place to host an autobiography that would not be suitable for mainspace. The editor's generally promotional pattern of edits is a contributing factor as well.  Gigs (talk) 18:17, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete all As per Gigs above. There are plenty of places on the internet for a CV to be hosted. Wikipedia is not one of them. -- Codeine (talk) 14:49, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Allow the user to reduce his UserSpace material to something in proportion to his contributions. He is a contributor, and he is responsive, so don't be too hard too quickly, but he must not be using Wikipedia, including his userpage, for promotion.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:25, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.