Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Charliesdun/sandbox/Charles Steven Dunn

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:34, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

User:Charliesdun/sandbox/Charles Steven Dunn


There is a time to call a halt to self promotion and this is it. Dunn is a decent jobbing lawyer doing a decent job and gaining some press coverage along the way, as lawyers do because of the cases they handle. Unless they are particularly special they are like taxi cabs, being hired to do a job of work. We do, I am sure, have some notable cab drivers. We have some notable lawyers, but it is time for this autobiography to be declined until the gentleman is notable. We can;t keep having editors think that "another edit and my draft will go live" when that just is not likely to happen. Fiddle  Faddle  14:47, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I agree. Drmies (talk) 22:26, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as blatant promo. Thomas.W talk 18:14, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Many lawyers engage in trial advocacy and have written, either for their clients or the general public, but that surely should not be the threshold for notability. wia (talk) 02:13, 9 May 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.