Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Charmaine Loh Jia Yi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was  Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 01:07, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

User:Charmaine Loh Jia Yi

 * 1) Userpage created by SPA for promotional purposes. Example of article space use for self-promotion: and Charmaine_Loh_Jia_Yi (now speedy deleted)
 * 2) It is a copy of deleted page Charmaine_Loh_Jia_Yi - so it is rather in breach of WP:USERPAGE guideline - WP is not free webhost, nor MySpace.
 * WP:BLP discourages posting personal information about minors, even on their own userpages. M0RD00R (talk) 15:28, 31 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, already mentioned, WP:NOTWEBHOST. —macyes: bot 18:01, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - try Geocities. // roux    18:39, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. Some of the deletion reasons may be valid, but others may not be. First of all, I do not think the user, as a minor, should have created a userpage featuring personal information, but on the other hand I don't believe Wikipedia ever adopted a policy about what to do that. I also note that this editor has only one mainspace edit after over a month, and that was to add her user page to a disambiguation page, so Editors matter doesn't apply here. Nor has she made any other edits in the last month. On the other hand, there is no real "self-promotion" or "promotional purposes" here (#1), because the editor has no service, product, job or career to promote at this time, nor does she mention having any on this userpage. Furthermore, I strongly disagree with the idea (#2) that if an editor creates a page about themself in the mainspace, which gets deleted as a biography of a non-notable person, that the editor should be forever banned from posting the same information on their userpage. In fact, such an editor should have created the page about themself as their userpage in the first place, so treating them as having copied a deleted page is inappropriate in such a case. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:38, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - given the user's lack of constructive mainspace contributions, I see little point in keeping this page around for them to use as personal webspace.  RichardΩ612  Ɣ ɸ 16:33, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.