Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Childhoodsend/Balance check


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Pages like this are effectively "enemies lists" for a content dispute (see recent thread on WP:CSN). This poisons the atmosphere and really isn't helpful.  &gt; R a d i a n t &lt;  10:51, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

User:Childhoodsend/Balance check
The page serves no useful purpose on Wikipedia. As far as I can tell, it more or less subtly tries to suggest how unfair Wikipedia and its admins are with respect to a certain topic. It certainly fails the claimed user page purpose, in that it does not "delineate views on Wikipedia, its functioning, or behavior of Wikipedians in general", but rather lists and classifies (via WP:OR) individual Wikipedians. Stephan Schulz 20:35, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * ?!? I was not aware that a subpage/sandbox of a userpage was required to serve a useful purpose on Wikipedia. I wonder why it troubles you so much, but if neutral parties concur that it really is misplaced, I'll delete it. No biggies. --Childhood&#39;s End 20:44, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * it's clear what it is getting at, and I am reluctant to interfere. It is perfectly in order to monitor admins, or even to say what you think of their neutrality. I think it does serve a useful purpose. DGG (talk) 20:45, 14 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep. Agree with DGG. --Bduke 22:23, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.