Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:ChristTrekker/2A

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ✗ plicit  14:36, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

User:ChristTrekker/2A

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Wikipedia is not a WP:SOAPBOX. If you must announce your politics do it in a concise manner, don’t give a whole speech to nobody. That’s not even getting to the design problems (this box is larger than some articles!). Dronebogus (talk) 12:51, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Does not promote collaborative building of the encyclopedia. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:43, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete this userbox is worthless. Catfurball (talk) 16:22, 31 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete as soapbox not serving encyclopedic purpose. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:19, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as a worthless collection of "wise" statements opposing much needed gun control. —Sundostund (talk) 22:11, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:40, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, per WP:TLDR, I don't visit userpages to read essays about their opinions in userboxes. Please be kind to my eyes... - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:36, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. I strongly object to users supporting deletion because WP:IDONTLIKEIT. However, its length relative to other userboxes is practically an essay, which makes it an outlier that definitely doesn't belong on a user page. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 05:01, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.