Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Christian Fernández Bazán/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Speedy deleted (G5) by User:RHaworth. — xaosflux  Talk 15:24, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

User:Christian Fernández Bazán/sandbox


Wikipedia isn't a crystal ball. If you want to make some hypothetical seasons, there's always Wikia. Nova Crystallis  (Talk)  21:05, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - I predict this article will be kept. Now, according to WP:CRYSTAL, we should delete this MfD page. (it doesn't apply to userspace). If someone wants to play around with an article that might not be ready for mainspace in their sandbox, so what? If it moves to mainspace, it can be AfDed or whatnot. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 21:53, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Except, this will never be a notable article. There is literally zero chance that the hurricane seasons will play out as predicted on this page (it is already wrong for the current season) so at best it is a WP:HOAX.—Jasper Deng (talk) 04:13, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE. YE Pacific Hurricane  22:25, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment strikes me as a test page or for collecting data on. I'd like to see what the creator has to say before voting. Legacypac (talk) 22:49, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Leaning Keep, it’s his sandbox, it’s not tracking a reality TV show, it matches the mainspace pages he edits. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:13, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
 * But it’s not (to both of your descriptions). The “data” is entirely fabricated and has no encyclopedic value whatsoever; it does not in any way “match the mainspace pages be edits”.—Jasper Deng (talk) 04:19, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
 * User:Jasper Deng, is the data merely test/example data, or is the data malicious/misleading/webhosting? I consider this the decisive question.  If the first, it is well within user leeway, even if you would do it differently.  If the second, then it crosses the reasonable leeway line.  The nomination statement is unpersuasive on this question.  You appear more interested ...  fabricated, OK, but fabricated test values doesn't sound unreasonable.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:50, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I think the edit summary of the initial edit creating the page ("New predictions") is pretty clear that this is not meant as a test, but as a clear and blatant misuse of the sandbox as Hypothetical Hurricanes wiki.--Jasper Deng (talk) 05:31, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:CRYSTAL WP:NOTWEBHOST.  Testing merits are discounted.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:35, 8 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep - It's an editing test of tables in a sandbox. It is pushing the envelope, but it isn't tearing the envelope.  Robert McClenon (talk) 03:32, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per WP:U5 (it doesn’t strictly apply here as the user has edited other pages, but only because of that). Just because it’s called a sandbox doesn’t mean they can do whatever they want. They know well how to use tables so in no world is this an “editing test”. —Jasper Deng (talk) 04:05, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete in support of the editors that edit in this topic area. Legacypac (talk) 04:22, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete because this page serves no purpose and infringe WP:CRYSTAL. Amisom (talk) 10:36, 8 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.