Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Chubbennaitor




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. NAC. Timotheus Canens (talk) 06:31, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Chubbennaitor
Not encyclopedic, just a bunch of non free images, user has admitted to leaving wikipedia, and this page takes up too much byte space, does NO overall good to the project, and can cause browsers to crash. Rasputin72 (talk) 06:10, 5 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep, no valid reason presented for deletion:
 * "Not encyclopedic": Encyclopedicity (is that a word?) is not required of user pages.
 * "Just a bunch of non free images": All of the images I examined were freely licensed.
 * "User has admitted to leaving Wikipedia": user pages are not deleted simply because the user is inactive. (Especially not if the inactivity is as short as two months, as it is here.)
 * "Takes up too much byte space": Twelve kilobytes is a pittance, and deleting the page won't even affect that.
 * "Does NO overall good to the project": Sure it does - it lists this user's uploaded contributions. Sounds good to me!
 * "Can cause browsers to crash": No more than any other image-heavy page. Works fine for me.
 * Zetawoof(&zeta;) 07:06, 5 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep if the images are free content, then I see no problem here. Gigs (talk) 15:05, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - since these are free images, the deciding factor for me is that these images were all uploaded by Chubbennaitor. Had this been a gallery of randomly-selected free images, then I could have supported deletion (largely since the user is retired); however, this is clearly not the case. –B LACK F ALCON  (T ALK ) 02:11, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. A record of uploads is entirely proper.  A gallery of thumbnails is a normal and highly sensible way to review images.  The page does not take up much space, it is just links, and see Performance.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:30, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Precedent is clear - galeries of allowed images are allowed on userpages. Most userpages are not encyclopedia articles, hence that is not a grounds for deletion.  "Admittted to leaving Wikipedia" is a novel reason for deletion, but not one founded in policies.  "Can cause browsers to crash" is absolutely not a grounds for deletion. Collect (talk) 19:54, 7 January 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.