Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Chubbennaitor/HAHA/Barnstar

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete all. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:27, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

User:Chubbennaitor/HAHA/Barnstar




These pages are listed here. The arguments for deleting secret pages are summarized in the essay Why secret pages should be deleted. WP:UP states that examples of unrelated content to writing an encyclopedia are "Games, roleplaying sessions, secret pages and other things pertaining to "entertainment" rather than "writing an encyclopedia". Such activities are generally frowned upon by the community. Facetious games of no educational value relevant to the project are routinely deleted at MfD." WP:NOTMYSPACE states that "[t]he focus of user pages should not be social networking or amusement, but rather providing a foundation for effective collaboration." To the creators: in a July/August 2010 policy discussion (at Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not/Archive 34), community consensus was that the policy What Wikipedia is not does prohibit secret pages. The deletion of this page is not a reflection on you; instead, it is a reflection of the changing community consensus that secret pages set an inappropriate ethos at Wikipedia. In that policy discussion, I wrote here about why all secret pages should be treated equally; whether a user social networks or does not social network on Wikipedia has no bearing on the fact that all secret pages should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 05:15, 6 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - all such pages should be deleted per WP:NOTMYSPACE, WP:UP. This goes double for 'established' editors, who should know better. → ROUX   ₪  20:05, 7 October 2010 (UTC)


 * An Oppose but a stort of weak one the fact, that I see this as unfair is because many users have their own "secret pages". But fine if you want to go a head. I don't really care...I have way more problems to worry about.-Angel David (talk) 23:05, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, there's history there. The short version is that we generally do want to delete all of them.  Last time someone tried with a bot it was kind of a mess, so we're going through them manually like this.  Gigs (talk) 02:35, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all except those shown to be of encyclopedic relevance (if any). FT2 (Talk 03:57, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.