Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Clamticore


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep; in my well-weighted opinion there's absolutely no need to take this farther and the consensus seems to be that this isn't harmful use of user space. Let's cut the bureaucracy here and now. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 21:47, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

User:Clamticore
"LOL WUT" (I think you know what I mean) &mdash; Coasterge ekperson 04 ' s talk@ 00:53, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep unless I'm missing something here. Some people just don't like redlinked user pages. -Jéské ( Blah  v^_^v ) 00:57, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Their userpage is in line with WP:UP. In addition, no warning or notice that you had concerns was given (not that there needed to be any warning, as once again the userpage is appropriate); this would have been helpful, as the user is currently active and could have responded to your concerns in a timely manner.  I politely suggest that this nomination be withdrawn. --jonny-mt(t)(c) Tell me what you think! 01:42, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep and I second the withdraw request, before the user feels they need to defend themself. Personally, I would just redirect to my talk page, but to each their own. Rocket000 (talk) 06:17, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep for crying out loud. No, there's no real content and the page is kind of pointless, but think if it this way: This deletion debate wastes more disk space on Wikimedia servers than the original page, which was not harmful in any way. (Analogy: I currently owe 0.10€ in late fees to the local library. I don't intend to pay until it just so happens that I somehow manage to rack up more fees, at least more than the cost to print the receipt. You know, that is better for the city economy. =) And here I'm contributing to the problem. Don't file paperwork in triplicate if you've got to sneeze. Have a nice day. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 14:15, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Does my usepage piss you off or something? Sure it's pointless, but why would you make this discussion just because of two words? If it means so much to you I will delete it myself. Clamticore (talk) 19:40, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Only administrators can delete pages; non-admins can only blank. Regardless, blanking still leaves a blue link. -Jéské ( Blah  v^_^v ) 19:54, 21 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, it's blank now. Time to close? Rocket000 (talk) 20:57, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.