Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Cnrqhrdl


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was No consensus--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 07:36, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

User:Cnrqhrdl
This looks like it's copied from a textbook, does not appear to have anything to do with Wikipedia... Beeblebrox (talk) 11:38, 6 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep It is short, does not violate copyright (it is, in fact, from Wikibooks) and if the person has it in userspace to work on it, then that is the only issue. Perhaps the article should be moved to a formal sandbox, but it appears to dono harm, promote no commercial interest, violate no copyright etc. And Wikibooks is oart of WP, IIRC. Collect (talk) 13:26, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I suppose it would be helpful to hear from this user, but my question would be, if it's from WikiBooks, why create a mirror page at Wikipedia? Instructional articles are not part of the Wikipedia project.Beeblebrox (talk) 19:24, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Well... that may be the case but... it could of course be a muse of some sort... we don't want to discourage creativity... on the other hand... it may well be a code of destruction... --➨ Candlewicke :) Sign/Talk 11:23, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Did you have a point in there somewhere? If you did I think I missed it. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:28, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Update *A full week later, no more changes, no explanation, page is a mirror of a page on another Wikimedia project, I still say delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:33, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * comment It may be worth pointing out also that the page we are discussing amounts to the sum total of this users contributions, they have never edited any other page. If they are working on something for WikiBooks, surely they should be doing that at Wikibooks... Beeblebrox (talk) 19:31, 7 Dzecember 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. I notice Cnrqhrdl was editing 1 minute before you added the MfD template. You then quickly welcomed the user, but perhaps the "For deletion" template scared the month-old user into not replying. I'm trying again on the talk page, so hopefully a dialogue is forthcoming. In the meantime, I don't see it doing any harm, and thus !vote weak keep assuming in good faith it has something to do with Wikipedia (experimenting with markup, or assisting in reading articles with Spanish words and phrases). It's weak because, though I disagree, I could see it being deleted under WP:UP #8. Gotyear (talk) 03:25, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.