Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Coalfacesally/A Woman's Deeper Journey Into Sex

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Keep. -- Jreferee (talk) 13:44, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

User:Coalfacesally/A Woman's Deeper Journey Into Sex


Duplicate of content deleted at A Woman's Deeper Journey Into Sex. Nothing suggests this will ever be notable, so the userspace draft can go too. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:29, 1 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Hello. I do wonder why you felt it necessary to delete this page. Does it mean that the page came be re-instated at a later date? Also, why is it just up to your advice to delete the page? I note that many pages on Wiki could be up for deletion. As regards the image. On what basis do you recommend it for deletion? I went to some trouble to do as requested - that is to send to wikimedia permissions on the 25th October 2013 Evidence of Permissions of the image. Do you have no contact with the administrational infrastructure for wiki that you can recommend deletion of an image even though I did exactly what was asked on me? I look forward to hearing from you. coalfacesally (talk) (Coalfacesally (talk) 01:48, 2 November 2013 (UTC))
 * Keep This is a draft of an article about a film which is unreleased. I supported deleting the article from main space, as it is not yet notable. However, it is quite possible that the film may become notable once it is released. I see no reason to delete this from user space, unless many months have gone by with no development of the article draft, and no evidence of notability.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  03:46, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep this actively edited userspace draft. Contrary to the nominator's opinion, reading the article suggests to me the film may become very popular and so meet our populist standards of notability. Indeed, I might go and ... But I have digressed. Thincat (talk) 17:34, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.