Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:CodeEaterVien/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep.  —&#8288;Scotty Wong &#8288;— 04:35, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

User:CodeEaterVien/sandbox

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Re-creation of Shift (company) which was deleted under WP:PROD. The concern was: "The games may be notable, but WP:BEFORE reveals no evidence the company is. See WP:NOTINHERITED." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fayenatic london (talk • contribs)
 * Keep: Since this was deleted under PROD, I would consider this draft allowable in the spirit of PROD's rules stipulating that the PROD is cancelled in the case that a single user objects and that users can ask for the article to be undeleted if it went through. I don't see any issue with the existence of the content as a userspace draft; users are allowed to retain drafts on topics that would not be accepted in article space, in case they become notable in the future. Although CodeEaterVein has made no edits other than to create this draft, there's no evidence that their intentions are non-constructive or that they won't come back to edit later, and if they do and find it deleted then this could end up a case of biting. Overall, I see no compelling reason to delete this, and in that case, it seems better to err on the side of keeping. silviaASH  (inquire within)  08:50, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep valid draft.—Alalch E. 12:44, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Decline as corp - Oh. Wait a minute.  This isn't AFC.
 * Keep - The nominator hasn't shown a reason to delete a draft, only to decline it. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:37, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * History merge with Shift (company) and keep in userspace. Do you realise the deleted article must be restored on request, an expired PROD?  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 14:41, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.