Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Codename Lisa/Being Evil 101

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 21:06, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

User:Codename Lisa/Being Evil 101


While I normally have an open mind about what my fellow colleague does, this essay is way over the line. What the hell was she thinking? Was she thinking at all? We already have enough people who resort to these ugly underhand tactics. An essay that actually teaches them is terminally dangerous to Wikipedia! Deletion is not enough! It must be suppressed too.

Also, there is an expression in it which is a direct reference to me. I have been nothing but nice to our Ms. Best Regards. I don't understand this animosity.  Fleet  Command ( Speak your mind! ) 08:15, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete--Her progress in whatever one could do wrong seems to be phenomenal! Winged Blades Godric  08:26, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep--Ha! There seems to have been a phenomenal mis-calculation:) Originally meant to say the last line about the OP but reversed the key-word! Winged Blades Godric  10:56, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. Hi, guys. First, this is a draft, started less than two days ago. The purpose of the user pages is enable the authors to work on their drafts unhindered. Second, the nominator already say that "We already have enough people who resort to these ugly underhand tactics", therefore, justifying an attempt to deal with this problem. If you guys see any problem with its tone, type of addressing its audience, etc. the correct venue is my user talk page. Third, I challenge you to quote the statement that is a direct reference to you. —Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 09:56, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. FleetCommand is clearly in another of his grumpy moods, thinking he has the right to control others' personal expression, and with some mission against argument couched in humour.  And Winged Blades is clearly his lackey.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:15, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per SmokeyJoe, with a smidgin of WP:USERESSAY, WP:UP#OWN, WP:UPYES, &Co. &mdash; fortuna  velut luna Rarely receiving (many) pings. Bizarre. 11:13, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Extraneous remarks Also, User:FleetCommand, would you mind losing it with the "our Ms" stuff? At the least it's patronizing, if not totally fucking WP:UNCIVIL :) Many thanks. &mdash; fortuna  velut luna Rarely receiving (many) pings. Bizarre. 11:17, 22 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep. I can hardly wait to see where this goes. It’s already priceless! 174.226.138.225 (talk) 11:10, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Hey,, are you seeing this? I am not expert but I believe this IP address to belong our long-time wiki-hound, the Flyboy, the person who tried the divide and conquer tactic highlighted in your essay and ended up actually giving a huge boost to our collaboration. I believe he is feeling joy from seeing you and I in a dispute. The problem with accusing two people of being socks is that they become sanctioned partners.  Fleet  Command ( Speak your mind! ) 13:36, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Hello, FleetCommand :)
 * Indeed the IP address and geolocation data matches what I have on record. But next time, please just drop me a private line and I'll revert him silently. (Yes, I even revert a "Strong Keep" with a capital K.) Better yet, I might call in an admin. You are right on the second account too. Once you can prove that the person accusing you is up to no good, he or she is pretty much entitled to nothing in Wikipedia. But also, you seem be an adherent of the "enemy of my enemy" POV, seeing how you've completely forgot that a couple of hours ago, you accused me of animosity. (Just for the record, I don't think calling me "Ms Best Regards" is, I quote, "f***ing WP:UNCIVIL" but I still rather you didn't use this nickname. You are at a stage in which giving a nickname to someone is only interpreted as uncivil.)
 * Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 14:21, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I didn't forget. I am more of an adherent to the "united we stand" principle. But that doesn't mean I've changed my mind about the essay. This whole situation is a total mess. How can so many Wikipedians not see what is plain wrong?  Fleet  Command ( Speak your mind! ) 05:02, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.