Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:CompanyDude/KratDOS

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Keep. User says they are working towards an article. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:24, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

User:CompanyDude/KratDOS


User has been working on this for five months and does not know when they are likely to finish. Google search suggests this software is non-notable. A case of using Wikipedia as a free host. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:20, 7 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, Wikipedia is not a host for random content. These particular drafts have been bothering me for months, it was evident they wouldn't become actual, viable articles. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 05:06, 8 September 2015 (UTC)


 * It is unclear what he is doing. It doesn't look like an article in the making, but neither does the user look like someone who can't find easier scratch space elsewhere.  Userpages are not restricted to article drafting, they can contain notes.  Why does it contain the template header userspace draft?  Maybe that got there by mistake, and it is a simple userpage?  This Wikipedian is active and productive, and these odd pages are probably within reasonable leeway.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:42, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Over 50% of all of this user's edits are to his userpages, and only a quarter of all his edits are to mainspace articles (101 edits currently). I wouldn't call that productive or reasonable. And besides this he clearly has a conflict of interest with regard to "KratOS" but he denies it. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 06:40, 19 September 2015 (UTC)


 * &, It is a sandbox draft. Yeah, it might not be an article that will be published but please... If you can delete my userpages then that's just not right... That's like removing my personal property... — Preceding unsigned comment added by CompanyDude (talk • contribs)
 * No, it's not. Please see WP:NOTWEBHOST. You're not entitled to host any material here, that's not what Wikipedia is for. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 06:40, 19 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Conditional Keep. Valid draft.   Jeraphine's measures of productive or reasonable are unacceptable.  There are no time limits, and there is no minimum of contribution.  However, the NOTWEBHOST allegation for a page that can be read as promotion is valid, and therefore the page should be blanked when not being actively edited.  "Keep", conditional on the author blanking the page when it is not being improved.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:47, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * On the other hand, re-reading... "Yeah, it might not be an article that will be published but please". The user must, in good faith, intend for the material to become suitable for mainspace, or it is not OK.  If CompanyDude can't outline a plan for this to be improved and moved to mainspace, then it probably should be deleted.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:50, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * ,Thanks,bro but i am improving and i do now intend for it to be released later and as you said there is no  time limits 


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.