Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Computerjoe/Draft

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  procedural close, already deleted. Avic ennasis @ 19:19, 21 Kislev 5777 / 19:19, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

User:Computerjoe/Draft
It doesn't state its purpose. This is just like Computerjoe's reason for Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:GeorgeMoney/UEW. So, if that page gets deleted, then so can this one. GeorgeMoney T&middot;C 15:53, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Please Speedy I have no use for this, though your reason for deletion is very poor - it sounds like you're trying to make a point. This is like voting oppose on a RfA as someone did it to you. Computerjoe 's talk 15:57, 29 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.