Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Comrade 47


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Nomination withdrawn. Seraphim Whipp 22:03, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

User:Comrade 47
User seems to be attempting to use his Wikipedia user page as a sort of resumé. Per WP:NOT, I propose deletion of this page. Tuvok[T@lk/Improve me] 05:00, 8 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Nomination withdrawn due to user's recent join date, and per comments made below. Anything I have to do to formally withdraw this nom? Tuvok[T@lk/Improve me] 18:42, 8 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Contributions tell no lies. I didn't even think to check when the user joined. Lesson learned for me, and keep for them. --jonny-mt(t)(c) Tell me what you think! 06:22, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. This person has only been editing a few days and may not know that this looks like a vanity article. They might have seen other articles about people and thought that's what their user page should look like. If someone thought the page was inappropriate, then a note should have been left, rather than potentially scaring them off by proposing deletion of their user space. I'll go drop a welcome note. Seraphim  Whipp 12:31, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep for now. I agree this violates WP:NOT but this user is new to wikipedia. Instead of deleting this user page we should leave a message on this users talk page telling him what he is allowed to have on his talk page and ask him to change it. If he does not change it in the next 2 weeks then we can delete it. We need to follow WP:BITE. If we go and delete it, we could be losing future Gracenotes, or the future Hut 8.5. That would not be good:(--SJP:Happy Verterans Day! 13:15, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Abstain, courteously These should be brought to the attention of the user in question first to make them aware of the policies. By bringing straight to MfD, we are not assuming good faith nor welcoming a newbie.  The user has no history of blatant vandalism or side-stepping the rules.  Nomination is not appropriate at this time; please reconsider discussing with the user in question first.--12 Noon 17:57, 8 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.