Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:ConnorJClements/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:08, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

User:ConnorJClements/sandbox


Article has not significantly improved in 3 reviews in 3 months, and the sources have still only been mere announcements and mentions; there's simply nothing what our own basic policies would consider convincing since they would even state against such simple business listings; in fact, examining all sources showed only published or republished announcements, company quotes, financial columns, press releases, mentions, company plans or all quite similar. Comparing this (current) and the past ones, there's been no balance of both significant improvements while also removing the overall PR environment. Even if there are no plans to resubmit, we're not a company webhost and Draft:Orion Health and Orion Health show concerns. SwisterTwister  talk  05:09, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.