Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Coronababy13

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Speedied. Attack page (CSD G10). Serious BLP violations with no acceptable version to revert to. Newyorkbrad (talk) 20:23, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

User:Coronababy13

 * – (View MfD)

This is more like a low-quality, unsourced, encyclopaedia article than a user page, and as best I can make out is about a family involved in the supply and distribution of illegal drugs and contains information about possibly living people. Creating this page in 2014 was the user's only edit to the project. The page was nominated for speedy deletion (U5) a month after creation by E Wing, but that nomination was declined by Nyttend as not being sufficiently obviously inappropriate for speedy deletion (an assessment I'm not challenging). Thryduulf (talk) 22:17, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete With BLP concerns the default should be delete, not keep. The page severs zero purpose and was the only edit by a throw away account created six years ago. No offense to the declining administrator, but if you're going to decline a speedy deletion nomination, at least remove the blatant BLP violation.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:28, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I removed the most blatant potential BLP violation. I know it can be controversial to modify pages under discussion this way while the discussion is ongoing, but that had to go.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:32, 17 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. A non contribution by a non-contributor, a single edit account from 2014.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:12, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete for various reasons including BLP, and that this just doesn't belong. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:06, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not an actual userpage. Glades12 (talk) 07:53, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. FYI, the page starts with "long before ..." and appears to be in the past tense. If the page referred to a living person I would be speedying it under BLP. Newyorkbrad (talk) 16:43, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * It used to additionally refer to (possibly) living people - see Ponyo's edit. Thryduulf (talk) 18:36, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * That's good enough for me to speedy the page right now as an attack page and under BLP, rather than spend another week drawing attention to that material. I don't understand why this wasn't deleted immediately by the first admin who saw it. Newyorkbrad (talk) 20:23, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.