Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Corporate Minion/Rokform

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Move to Article space so it can be listed at AFD The creator wants a debate on the sourcing but the appropriate venue for that has to be AfD. Ergo the page needs to be in mainspace for that. Spartaz Humbug! 15:58, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * NOTE:16:02, 3 December 2012 Spartaz (talk | contribs) moved page User:Corporate Minion/Rokform to Rokform without leaving a redirect (Moving to list at AFD). -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 12:18, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

User:Corporate Minion/Rokform


Non-notable commercial product. Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  17:49, 1 December 2012 (UTC)


 * It has coverage in WIRED, CNN, CNET and Mashable, but no in-depth professional product reviews and some articles do not cover it in substantial depth. I have a COI, but felt it was a borderline case worth an AfD discussion. Thanks for your consideration. Corporate 18:01, 1 December 2012 (UTC)


 * reply - normally I would have let it sit for a while, but I understand you wanted an AfD discussion started, so was willing to oblige. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  18:05, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I am obliged good sir. I wasn't sure the process for AfDing an article not currently in article-space. Corporate 18:20, 1 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep as passing WP:GNG. (Note that I passed the article at AfC initially based on the same reasoning).  -- No  unique  names  18:21, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - The page has made quite the rounds! 1) User space, 2) AfC, 3) Article space 4) back to user space, and now 5) at MfD. User:Corporate Minion created the page, the page is in User:Corporate Minion's user space, Autohor wants a deletion discussion (per above). I see that as a WP:G7 Author requests deletion. (The page was created 16 November 2012‎, which is too soon to fall under WP:STALEDRAFT.) -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 04:20, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The page was drafted in userspace and then taken to AfC. It was approved and moved to article space.  An admin then deleted it under WP:CSD.  I asked for a REFUND, as GNG was satisfied.  Corporate suggested that it should have gone through AfD instead of CSD.  Now it's here.  -- No  unique  names  21:22, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The article is in user space, which is judge by WP:UP, not WP:GNG. The result of the REFUND request was "userify" to user space, not "restore to article space." If the deleting admin does not agree to restore the page to article space, then the matter needs to go to WP:DRV to see whether DRV agrees to restore the article to article space. MfD is not going to get the page into article space, no matter how many people think it meets GNG. The outcome of this MfD discussion won't be send to AfD because that is not what MfD does or has the authority to do. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 04:25, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks Uzma. I kept thinking in the back of my head that something was off. The net-net is that Noun accepted the article, another editor deleted it and I would just like to get a consensus decision one way or another. What's the best way to go about fixing this predicament? Corporate 06:47, 3 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - Please do not count my "vote" per my COI, but I am posting to make it more clear that I do in fact prefer the article remain, but requested an AfD to determine if there was consensus to keep it. Corporate 20:22, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.