Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Craho

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. --BDD (talk) 16:51, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

User:Craho


In line with Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Deaths in 2013/My OR stuff and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bensonfood, WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE concerns. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:07, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST and possibly WP:NOTHERE. Since 18 December 2011, not counting three edits to the Future Supercentenarians page, this user has made ZERO edits outside of their userpage. CommanderLinx (talk) 05:32, 19 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST Ca2james (talk) 01:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Keep Since when does wikipedia delete users' home pages? Longevitydude (talk) 18:49, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Keep; I agree with Longevitydude here. Futurist110 (talk) 19:22, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
 * All the time. This one is up for deletion because it fails WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE and the user is clearly WP:NOTHERE to contribute to the encyclopedia because all their edits are done purely on their userpage. CommanderLinx (talk) 10:11, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Not all of his edits were on his user page and even if they were, is it really a violation of policy not to edit articles? He made five edits to List of Canadian supercentenarians, one edit to User:AMK152/107, and four edits to WikiProject World's Oldest People/Future supercentenarians. Longevitydude (talk) 15:26, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia deletes user home pages when they violate WP:USERPAGE, and it does happen all the time. This editor has made 253 edits, of which 243, or 96%, are on their own userpage. The other 10 edits were made in the same project and none were made to any article pages (unless you could the Wikiproject page as an article page, in which case this editor made four edits there). The vast majority of this editor's contributions are not to improve the encyclopaedia. Ca2james (talk) 21:18, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * With respect, how would you know his intentions, and since when are there rules against only editing in one wikiproject? His contribution are indeed about improving the encyclopedia in this wikiproject.  There are certain people who would delete the World's oldest people project and have made war against as many longevity related articles as possible. Longevitydude (talk) 02:23, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.