Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Crumples88/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. JohnCD (talk) 11:42, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

User:Crumples88/sandbox


Looks like WP:FAKEARTICLE, WP:NPOV and maybe eligible for G11. Stefan2 (talk) 01:10, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * User:Crumples88/sandbox & User:Crumples88 are identical and are too promotional in tone and lack any independent sources. It would survive WP:CSD#A7, and could possibly be notable, but could not survive AfD without independent reliable sources.  At only 3 days old, this nomination is bitey.  If it can't be improved, it will have to be deleted as promotion.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:28, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I should have noticed that the page was very recent. Still, if the page isn't improved, it would have to be deleted as promotion. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:26, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep As SJ notes, hits WP:BITE. Moreover, it is basically harmless at this point. Try the six month mark. Collect (talk) 23:49, 31 March 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.