Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Cskumaar/Maruthuvar community

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. (NAC) Armbrust The Homunculus 09:50, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

User:Cskumaar/Maruthuvar community
Relisted. Armbrust The Homunculus 10:27, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The page has been moved to . davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  02:39, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The page has been moved to . davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  02:39, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

I'm guessing someone thinks this is a real article. We also have User:Vishwagna, User:Brahmin nayee and User:Niyoginayeebramhana. all quasi articles and all edited by Dougweller (talk) 14:09, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * '''Complex recommendation:
 * Move the latter 3 to user-sub-pages and leave a note on the respective users' user pages pointing to the new location. This should have been boldly-done before this went to MfD.
 * Courtesy-blank all 4 pages replacing the content with a note saying the previous content can be found in the edit history. This is only necessary because these editors seem to have stopped editing and are therefore not likely to be using this content.
 * Semi-protect or even fully-protect all affected pages to prevent non-logged-in editors from changing them. This is only necessary because these editors seem to have stopped editing and are not likely to notice and undo unwanted changes by third-party editors.
 * Leave a note on all 4 editor's talk pages explaining what was done and why it was done, providing links to this discussion, WP:User pages, WP:Userspace draft, and if articles about the topics in question exist, links to those articles. Let editors know that the page protections will be lifted upon request.
 * In cases where the topic does not have an article but where the topic is notable enough to qualify for one, leave a note explaining that if the pages are actually draft articles and not "user content," the editor is encouraged to restore them provided that they will be actively worked on with the intent of moving them to the main encyclopedia.
 * In cases where the topics are notable, an article is strongly desired, and either the current version or any past version would make an acceptable article as-is or with minor effort (or if a volunteer is ready to do the required work immediately), simply move the page into the main encyclopedia or to Draft: space for further work. I am not familiar enough with these topics to know if this suggestion is relevant or not.
 * davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  19:20, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Additional recommendation: Since the page User:Cskumaar/Maruthuvar community appears to be under active editing, I recommend that it be moved to Draft:Maruthuvar community and replaced with a soft redirect.  Leave a note on the page-owners talk page explaining what happened and why.  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  23:54, 9 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment Well, the account created his/her page almost 3 years ago with 2 edits and hasn't edited since.  created that page almost a year ago with 4 edits, no edits since. 's page was created in December with the only edit that account made. Except for  who has made only one edit only and that to this page, all the edits have been by IPs. And finally  created his/her page with 5 edits 2 weeks ago but only  has edit it since. It's my conclusion that these accounts do not represent different individuals but are likely the same person, perhaps simply confused about what they are doing. Off to bed shorly, will see if others comment and think about what to do next. Dougweller (talk) 20:39, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * While I concede that this is likely the case, since there is no obvious abuse of multiple accounts or disruption (beyond the mere existence of these pages, if you consider that disruption), it's probably better to assume that they may be different individuals and decide accordingly. davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  21:31, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: The page has been blanked by . - The Bushranger One ping only 08:20, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: The mfd and user page templates were removed from User:Cskumaar/Maruthuvar community in early April. I have restored the mfd tag but as the page is blank there is no need to restore the "user page" tag.  I recommend watchlisting all of the pages listed in this MFD.  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  19:54, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Question for Did you intend for the other 3 articles to be considered for deletion?  If so, please add mfd to the top of them (consider adding a stern "don't remove this" warning) and re-start the clock on this entire MFD.  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  19:58, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment I haven't forgotten about this, just trying to figure out how to do it without bothering you. I'll ask at the help desk as my question at Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion remains answered. I'll probably move the page you suggest moving. Dougweller (talk) 08:07, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Relisting comment: No clear consensus here at all, so relisting for further comments.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Number   5  7  15:48, 14 May 2014 (UTC)




 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.