Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Cube b3/senile team

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete, history merge not needed as this is a copy, note this is NOT User:Cube b3/Senile Team which was the undeleted and userfied version of the same article. — xaosflux  Talk 14:25, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

User:Cube b3/senile team


Fails WP:UP. Hasn't been substantively edited since 2011, appears to have been copied into userspace to avoid an AfD that occurred around that time. —/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 15:09, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I moved it to Senile Team several years ago.--Cube b3 (talk) 18:36, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * In that case, do you want this draft deleted? A2soup (talk) 20:03, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Admins have a history merge option, right? Maybe we can use that?--Cube b3 (talk) 20:05, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Think so. Looks like the correct action here is WP:HISTMERGE with Senile Team. A2soup (talk) 20:40, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Histmerge is the wrong move here. This is an unedited userspace copy of an article that was pulled out of mainspace during an AfD. See [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Cube_b3/senile_team&oldid=406136977 this revision]. There is no attribution requirement because the history of Senile Team predates this userspace copy. In fact, this userspace copy is, technically speaking, a copyright violation. I tagged a couple of Cube b3's other userspace drafts for histmerege where there was substantive userspace history from multiple editors that needed attribution. —/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 21:22, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Senile_Team_(3rd_nomination) kind of makes a history merge redundant. Delete per results of the recent AfD. Legacypac (talk) 16:55, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: as per @Legacypac rationale.  Quis separabit?  12:50, 16 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.