Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Curtis Paul Campbell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 22:31, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

User:Curtis Paul Campbell
Advertising or promotion of a business, organization, or group unrelated to Wikipedia, excessive personal information, extensive self-promotional material; user has been deleted and reinstated before for same reasons and was advised before to follow WP:USER guidelines when setting up page again. --Funandtrvl (talk) 04:48, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wikipedia is not a social networking site. MER-C 09:47, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Obvious self-promotion and excessive amount of personal information unrelated to Wikipedia content. Searching for the name does not reveal even one mention in other articles. High risk of future disruptive behaviour. Delete the page and preferably ban user - but this time for good. Violates not only WP:USER and WP:NOT, but most importantly WP:AUTO and WP:NOTE. Reading his promotional content makes you think he really deserves an article (or an autobiography at that). But check this simple Google search to see how far-fetched it is. OutOfTimer (talk) 13:52, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Userspace one page c.v. is valid use of userspace. No commercial links or spam. Userspace is not required to have encyclopedia articles, thus notability is not a valid issue. AUTO and NOTE do not apply here.  Page is in accord with WP:USER and no valid reasons for deletion are furnished. As for "ban user" - that is exceedingly beyond the bounds of MfD discussion. Collect (talk) 14:45, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * No, it is not a valid use of userspace in case the user has no contribution to the main space and information in the userspace have absolutely no relation to Wikipedia. To say it loud and clear again, Wikipedia is NOT a free web host. This User Page was already deleted by Admin xaosflux and re-created by the user in bad faith to promote themselves. WP:AUTO and WP:NOTE indeed apply to the main space but my point was that there is a high probability that the user will try to engage in further disruptive behaviour and create an article that would violate these. It was a precaution but I did not express my intentions clearly enough. There is a large number of valid reasons for deletion and I encourage you to read WP:USER again. In addition, I have the right to state that I believe the user should be banned. OutOfTimer (talk) 15:16, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I've analysed this User's contributions and it seems he was inserting the name of his band into main space articles. He has no other contributions to the main space whatsoever. His edits comprise of User Page changes only. If there are problems with providing evidence for this, I'll post a set of appropriate links. In my opinion, the user should be banned. OutOfTimer (talk) 15:16, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I would also advise User:Collect to re-read WP:USER again, as the reasons for deleting this user page are copied right from the WP:UP page section. It is pretty hard to miss that section, if you've actually read the page thoroughly. --Funandtrvl (talk) 17:21, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * And "Excessive personal information (more than a couple of pages) unrelated to Wikipedia." is right there. Seems conclusive. Collect (talk) 13:57, 25 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete self promotional, blanking was tried and failed. If user persists then a block would be in order, but we don't issue blocks as punishment. Gigs (talk) 14:44, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note that: previous intervention was in September 2007; we do block to stop a trend of addition of inappropriate material, though more than one warning per two years might be expected. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:05, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Edit userpage back to a bare minimum in keeping with the user's serious contributions (very few). --SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:05, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. This user appears to be on Wikipedia for the sole purpose of promoting ad advertising, and his userpage proves that, since 86% of his edits are in the user namespace according to here. -- 科学高爾夫迷 01:24, 28 July 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

makes the following statement:
 * "This Article is a historical count of the life of Curtis Paul Campbell...There is no promotion or advertising in this article. It is simply an account of his life and his life's work. This article is still being Edited. Thank You".

--SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:52, 21 March 2012 (UTC)