Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DAde


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was deleted by Guy. Whisp e ring 23:59, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

User:DAde
Delete this user page violates WP:UP and is "Extensive discussion not related to Wikipedia," "Other non-encyclopedic material," and a "Polemical statement." This user page does nothing but incite other users and is counter to the wiki spirit of cooperation with other editors to make useful contributions to Wikipedia. It is also a violation of WP:POINT as the editor is using this page as a forum for editions which were not accepted by concensus into articles at Islamic extremist terrorism and Islam. Editor should keep in mind that Wikipedia is NOT a battleground. Strothra 19:13, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:UP. This appears to be a platform for cut and paste POV pushing that veers well into WP:POINT teritory, , ,  are just a few examples.--Isotope23 19:19, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. (→ Netscott ) 21:09, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Yikes, this goes against a lot of policies.-- Seadog ♪ 22:34, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep It is clearly related to wikipedia as all of many of those quotes are present in articles on Islam. It is encyclopedic. It is not a polemical statement; what is the statement? I think at the very least the violation of those policies is not clear cut, and he should have some latitude as to what to do with his userpage. Arrow740 12:44, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Giving an editor latitude with their userpage is one thing, but allowing them to use their userspace as a platform for cut and paste WP:POINT editing and disruption just makes no sense.--Isotope23 18:24, 29 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:UP, also being as a quick resource for spamming in articles as as been highlighted above.  ITAQALLAH   13:50, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I have deleted this entirely inappropriate diatribe. There is no chance whatsoever that it would ever be appropriate abywhere in this project. Guy (Help!) 18:50, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.