Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DN-boards1/Augustine Tessier

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Speedy deleted per WP:CSD - Copyright infringement due to copy/paste without attribution. HighInBC 01:43, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

User:DN-boards1/Augustine Tessier


Userification isn't when Augustine Tessier is up for deletion and you want to "save" the article. Since the history isn't being saved, it's a copyright violation. The editor here can request userification with the closing admin at Articles for deletion/Augustine Tessier if they want. Ricky81682 (talk) 01:16, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
 * How is it copyright? DN-boards1 (talk) 01:17, 11 October 2015 (UTC)


 * It is not obvious. But here is the gist of it: Copying_text_from_other_sources. This copy paste version lacks proper attribution is a copyright violation because of that. You can put attribution in an edit summary linking to the old article, but if the old article is deleted then that is no longer enough.


 * The best way to continue on the article would be to work on it in article space during the AfD, and if it is deleted you can talk to the deleting admin about getting the history restored and transferred to your userpace. If it every gets up to standards it can be moved back.


 * The reason this is important is so that everyone can tell who contributed what which is required by the license of our text. HighInBC 01:28, 11 October 2015 (UTC)


 * It's also important to have one version of an article around. We shouldn't be having a discussion at AFD on that version while another version is around for later keeping. An admin can userify it after deletion or you can create a new, separate one but the prior discussion will be relevant if you make it "live" again which includes what the article looked like then. If you would consider blanking or requesting deletion of this page, I'm certain that you can get it userified. I'd suggest putting it in draftspace under the WP:AFC system so that it's evaluated by others and we don't have another round of AFD if you take it to articlespace again. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 01:36, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.