Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DRosenbach/Doubt in Jewish law

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Delete with the consent of the editor who created it, but with a minnow whack to the nominator for not bringing it up on that editor's talk page first. --RL0919 (talk) 02:27, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

User:DRosenbach/Doubt in Jewish law
Userspace should not be used to indefinitely host private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes per WP:STALEDRAFT. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 13:42, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Was there any attempt made to discuss this with DRosenbach? He seems to be a currently active editor. This step should almost always be taken before nominating a userspace page for deletion. Newyorkbrad (talk) 13:48, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * No. I saw the 29 December 2008 last edit date of the page and figure enough time had passed. Also, his talk page had speedy deletion notices, copyright problem notices, and a deletion notice. I am using descrition in these listings. For example, I didn't list User:Carlaude/Jewish History and several other pages of currently active editors. Thanks for the note. I'll try to be more aware of established users user pages in my future efforts. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 13:58, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you don't understand how Wikipedia works, Gamal -- people make mistakes and other people correct them. So the fact that I have numerous posts on my talk page dealing with with copyright issues is because I do stuff on Wikipedia -- not because I'm a delinquent who deserves frequent castigation.  I'm fine with the deletion, though -- I didn't even realize that I had that page and I do not even recall starting it, despite it having been created by me.  DRosenbach  ( Talk 17:17, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your reply, D. I checked over your Wikipedia efforts and they are sizable. Also, I too like that Bongo playing Feynman. Take care. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 12:12, 7 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. There is nothing stale about this draft.  There are no time limits.  There is nothing offensive in the draft.  Is there anything misleading or or correct in it?  If there is anything arguable, any edit or may fix it, or even blank the page. Note that any editor may edit the draft and move it to mainspace.  Coming straight to MfD was premature.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:10, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per 's comment above: "I'm fine with the deletion, though." Cunard (talk) 10:21, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I hadn't noticed that. Preferably, DRosenbach would be more explicit.  Does the project want it, or not?  It looks like it could be a reasonable start for an article to me.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:50, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * If the creator, DRosenbach, is "fine with deletion", deletion of this unsourced material would not be a loss to the project. If he wishes to keep it for work on article, I will withdraw my "delete" position. Cunard (talk) 11:08, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * To me, it reads as an interesting teaser. If real, it would make an interesting article.  Unfortunately, I cannot easily find sources, and I am not familiar with the general subject.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:37, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.