Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Daedalus969/207.237.33.36


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was speedily deleted as CSD G10, attack page. Gwen Gale (talk) 16:24, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

User:Daedalus969/207.237.33.36
See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Daedalus969/list and the rationale given there. This is a content fork of part of that page. The same arguments apply:
 * This sort of page is problematic. Keeping private lists of users that one has issues with tends to be frowned on by the community. If there are issues with particular users, they should be brought to the appropriate dispute resolution or administrative attention page, such as WP:RFCU, WP:SPI, WP:ANI or the like, so that the community can deal with them, not retained indefinitely. Per precedent deleting similar pages previously, this page should be deleted

Please note. IPs are people too and we shouldn't keep private lists of IPs this way any more than we keep private lists of usernames. If these truly are IPs operated by the same user, the appropriate place to collect the data and findings is a subpage of WP:SPI. There is no sign that the user is going to act on this information in any particular time. For reference the referenced MFD for User:Daedalus969/list was (IMHO) trending toward delete when the user forked this page, and then requested deletion, resulting in a speedy close. Per precedent of that MFD, delete. ++Lar: t/c 16:13, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per point 10 of the relevant aspect of our guidelines Fritzpoll (talk) 16:18, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. Gwen Gale (talk) 16:24, 4 June 2009 (UTC)