Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Daenumen/atheism

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Courcelles 22:19, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

User:Daenumen/atheism
This is blatant soapboxing in userspace, there is no chance it will ever be useful to the project, user who created it is indef blocked for their insistence on using Wikipedia in this manner. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:56, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Soapbox page by a user that showed no grasp of Wikipedia's purpose.&mdash;Kww(talk) 21:19, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: The (now apparently indef blocked) user had created this (on 7-Sep-2010) in user space after we finally managed to convince him —and a few other contributors— that his favourite discussion topic was not welcome on Talk:Atheism. The discussion continued for two more weeks on User talk:Daenumen/atheism. - DVdm (talk) 21:27, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * ... and ended up being totally unconstructive and a waste of time. I (and a couple others) AGF'd to the point of insanity, until it became painfully evident that guidelines and policies on what was includable on WP were not his concern, while promoting fringe/hateful/derogatory theories was. Sorry it got this far... when he went dormant, I presumed that was the end of it. R OBERT M FROM LI &#124; TK/CN 18:30, 19 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Wikipedia is neither a soapbox nor a free web host. MER-C 02:23, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT, Wikipedia is not a soapbox or a free web host. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 15:59, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, and much wasted time (on my part) ensuring (with others' help) that all the policies and guidelines were spelled out numerous times - it has become apparent that this editor has no intention of concerning themselves with such, and just wants to spew hate and nonsense or use Wikipedia as a soapbox for fringe theories that only he seems to hold (see other MfD's for this editor's userspace for more examples). R OBERT M FROM LI &#124; TK/CN 02:22, 19 November 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.