Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Daenumen/muhammad

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Courcelles 22:19, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

User:Daenumen/muhammad
User was blocked for their insistence on soapboxing/preaching to other users. Moving it into their userspace does not magically make it appropriate. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:54, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Soapbox page by a user that showed no grasp of Wikipedia's purpose.&mdash;Kww(talk) 21:19, 17 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Wikipedia is neither a soapbox nor a free web host. MER-C 02:18, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, and much wasted time (on my part) ensuring (with others' help) that all the policies and guidelines were spelled out numerous times - it has become apparent that this editor has no intention of concerning themselves with such, and just wants to spew hate and nonsense or use Wikipedia as a soapbox for fringe theories that only he seems to hold (see other MfD's for this editor's userspace for more examples). R OBERT M FROM LI &#124; TK/CN 02:22, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: I think the page should be judged on its own merits. First of all, it's a user page, and contains only a list of precepts from conventional Muslim teachings. I was unable to find any hate, nonsense or fringe theories. If the user in question is engaged in bad behavior elsewhere, that should be addressed, but to focus on this page seems inappropriate. Delia Peabody (talk) 14:29, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. We give pretty wide latitude to personal essays in userspace, and I see no reason why this one should be deleted. If this was a few paragraphs on the user's thoughts about model railroading, nobody would have nominated it for deletion; it shouldn't be treated differently because it's about Islam. The user's behavior previously shouldn't be a factor in deciding whether to keep this page.&mdash; Chowbok  ☠  14:45, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Soapbox, does not aid the building of an encyclopedia.  Wikipedia is not the place to push your religious beliefs. Resolute 15:19, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. this SPA account is indeed soapboxing and has no interest in the project overall, just personal POV. Doc  Tropics  15:36, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTSOAPBOX and WP:NOTWEBHOST and per the fact that has been blocked indefinitely for soapboxing. Cunard (talk) 09:37, 24 November 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.