Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Daircpaul




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Although there is not a time lmit, this does appear to have been abandoned and is no longer a work in progress, and is a partial copyvio to boot. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:04, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

User:Daircpaul
Account's only purpose seems to be to edit this userspace article, which has been untouched for 18 months. Subject of article is of dubious notability and therefore WP:NOTWEBHOST applies. Psychonaut (talk) 15:04, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Notability not needed in userspace. "Untouched" is a novel reason for deletion. Moreover, yet one more person who was never welcomed with info on WP policies and processes. Collect (talk) 15:06, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep as there is no time limit.    ArcAngel   (talk) (review ) 20:23, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment on copyright violation - part of the user page is a copyright violation of . JulieSpaulding 12:38, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE; userspace is not for long-term archival of material that would be deleted in the mainspace. The page has not been edited in 18 months. If it's a copyvio, all the more reason to delete as a violation of policy. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 02:06, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.