Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Daniel/Hidden

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Speedy keep, nomination withdrawn. Hut 8.5 15:24, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

User:Daniel/Hidden
Hidden/Secret pages no longer acceptable. SPhilbrick T  02:41, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I suggest that you look carefully at the content of the page before you start templating pages for deletion, Sphilbrick. &mdash;Dark 04:14, 11 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep This is not a hidden/secret page, in that the page's purpose is not to have others search for it. There are no promises of barnstars; nor are there lists of fancy signatures from social-networking users who found the page. From the first two edits and the subsequent ones, User:Daniel/Hidden appears to be merely a test page. Cunard (talk) 04:15, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep My bad - yes, I saw a raft of secret and hidden pages at MFD, decided to look for one myself, and thought I found one. (It occurs to me that I don't know the proper procedure for undoing the action - I rolled back the notice, is that right? Can I mark this section as resolved?) -- SPhilbrick  T  13:30, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.