Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DanielmatthewEffin

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Delete. All pages identified in the MFD will be deleted. The suspected sockpuppet pages will be tagged as such and protected to prevent recycling. The main user page will be left unprotected for normal use. --RL0919 (talk) 15:43, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

User:DanielmatthewEffin
Blatant self promotion, nominating the parent page and a subpage based around an unnamed unreleased album he hasnt made yet -- Bob House 884 (talk) 14:00, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

I'd like to add this to the nom also, its a sockpuppet account which does the same thing in a slightly less developed way. User has a further sockpuppet User:TaintedLoveSong but doesn't seem to use that page for adverts. Both sockpuppets are blocked by the way Bob House 884 (talk) 13:07, 20 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment - OK, he seems to have blanked the page and replaced it with a C&Ped page from the mainspace. I don't know what should be done here as he seems to have been using his user main page to alternately create adverts for himself and then drafts of updates to articles. He is totally unreponsive to multiple talk page warnings and comments. Maybe I should take this somewhere else? Bob House 884 (talk) 16:12, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. It may help to get an MfD consensus to get control over such a situation. Let the MfD run its course and see what happens. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 05:37, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion." Because this page violates WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 10:10, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree with that the MfD should be kept open. Delete also per WP:NOTADVERTISING and per the fact that the page history of the copied article is in violation of the GFDL attribution requirements. Cunard (talk) 10:10, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree with the nominator's addition of User:UntitledDanielMatthewAlbum to the nomination. Cunard (talk) 19:12, 20 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete User:DanielmatthewEffin and User:UntitledDanielMatthewAlbum per WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTADVERTISING – anemone projectors – 22:25, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment User:TaintedLoveSong now apppears to be used in a similar way to the other two. And anyway, as it was blocked as a sockpuppet (by me, though I assumed good faith and didn't feel it necessary to block the original user), wouldn't it be better off displaying some kind of sockpuppetry template? Also, how can we stop him from just recreating these pages? He's allowed a userpage, and he uses his userspace for drafts on other articles (though subpages would be better, surely?). – anemone projectors – 22:28, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.