Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Danielpr


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete; Wikipedia is not a free webhost. If these users ever plan on returning, their user page being deleted will be the least of their worries.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 06:34, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

User:Danielpr
Valueless user page of a user who registered an account and only made one edit: creating his or her user page. The user has made no other contributions to the project in any sense. --MZMcBride (talk) 22:55, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - User has not made any edits in over two years, userpage is not helpful to the project. Tiptoety  talk 23:02, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Tip.  MBisanz  talk 00:54, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Userpage is not helpful to the project. -- Suntag (talk) 01:12, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is ridiculous. I fail to see why we need to bother to delete it. Userpages are not supposed to contain a value in itself. There is no present policy based reason to delete. The message we do not want to send to inactive users is: if you make only one edit, your edit will be deleted due to inactivity. We want to retain users, not delete their userpages.  Syn  ergy 03:56, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete them all: Worthless; per nom and per the above. - Rjd0060 (talk) 17:43, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * keep and have no more such nominations. The time, effort, and resources spent on them is more than they take to keep around indefinitely. There is no harmful content besides the very most trivial identification--this is no real sense using us as a home page --people who want such typically have much more to say about themselves.  These pages aren't worth the clean--up costs. According to the [nom| User talk:MZMcBride], these have been nominated as test pages to explore what to do about the 15,000 or so other pages of this sort. It's time to stop wasting not just computer resources, but human ones, on this. And some day perhaps a user will come back--if someone visited once, they may visit again--if only 1% do that's still 150 contributors who should have welcome notices waiting for them, not the discouragement of finding their single trace here removed. DGG (talk) 20:45, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per DGG. Let's not get delete-happy! Intothewoods29 (talk) 00:18, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - We should delete all user pages of inactive users with little to no mainspace edits. VegaDark (talk) 02:21, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per my comments on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Efrym87. -- Ned Scott 03:18, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete in principle (per nom, Tiptoety, etc.); user's only edit was nearly 3 years ago. Also see comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Efrym87. –Black Falcon (Talk) 15:14, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep And just NOINDEX all user pages. Any possible problems solved so we don't have to make sure 3,000,000 users are current with their membership fees. rootology ( C )( T ) 06:50, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.